Ceramic Petrography Laboratory

Detailed Methods

Binocular Microscope Characterization of the Sherds

Once the flow chart is complete as far as possible, it can be used to characterize the temper composition of sherds. Sherds are examined at 10 to 15 power magnification using a circular fluorescent illuminator.

Three to four variables are used to characterize temper composition. The first variable, temper type, is used to characterize what type of material was used to temper the sherd. For instance, is it sand, schist or muscovite mica, grog, or a mixture of materials?

Temper Type codes

The second temper variable(s), generic temper source, is used to characterize the geographic and tectonic origin of the temper grains observed. If a project has a large number of sherds with mixed tempers—say sand and crushed rock—then two generic temper source variables are used, one for sand, and one for crushed rock. A given sherd is attributed to a generic source based on binocular microscopic observation of the sand grains known to define particular geographic and tectonic settings and/or the distinctive crushed rock types seen in the paste.

Example of TSG Sand codes
Example of TSG Rock codes

The third temper variable, specific temper source, was used to characterize the petrofacies of origin for the observed temper grains. A given sherd was attributed to a specific source based on the binocular microscopic observation of the distinctive suite of rock fragments and monomineralic grains in the abundances known to define a particular petrofacies . In this way, we used the precise data gained from the thin section studies and semiquantitative abundance assessments as a means of assigning tempers to petrofacies without thin-sectioning each sherd.

Example of Petrofacies Summary

The difference between the "generic" and "specific" temper source attributes lies in the finer level of spatial resolution implied by the petrofacies. In practice, the information represented by the "generic" attribute is redundant with the information represented by the "specific" attribute when the sand temper observed in a given sherd permits its assignment to a petrofacies. It is sometimes the case, however, that the temper does not exhibit any or all sand grains necessary for a specific assignment. For example, it is often difficult to characterize the specific temper source of small or badly burned sherds. However, the temper grains that can be observed in small or badly burned sherds are often sufficient to categorize the generic origin of the sand. Important compositional and limited provenance information would be lost in those cases if only an attribute recording the petrofacies of origin was required during analysis, because all generic petrofacies assignments would, by definition, have to be recorded as "indeterminate."

Analysis of Sherd Thin Sections: Testing the Binocular Microscope Characterization

The binocular microscopic temper characterization is tested by classifying each sand-tempered sherd's petrofacies membership using the discriminant functions derived from the sand samples. In order to do this a stratified sample is selected from the characterized sherds for point counting. The point counted sample is stratified by temper composition (the unique combinations of the temper type, generic source, and specific source variables), time period, and site. Our goal is to get an even representation of the analytical groups important to the archaeological questions being studied.

Selection of sherds for thin sectioning within the temper groups is not random, since only sherds large enough to be thin sectioned (i.e., ~ 27 × 46 mm) could be included. Sherds are saturated with epoxy, then sectioned parallel to the vessel wall to provide a large area for point counting. They are stained for potassium feldspar and plagioclase feldspar. All sherd thin sections have permanent cover slips placed on them. Sand size material in the sherds is then counted using the same methods and grain types as for the sands except that the additional parameters grog and clay lumps are included in the point count. In addition, “paste” and voids are counted, but they are excluded from the count of total temper grains.

Sherd Point Count Results (Example)

Once the sherds have been counted, their data is submitted for discriminant analysis as “unweighted” or unknown samples. The functions calculated for the sand samples are used to classify the sherds—the sherds themselves do not contribute to the classification scheme.

After statistical analysis is complete, the predicted group memberships are compared to those predicted by both the petrographer and the ceramicist, and a final petrofacies determination is made. In most cases, there is agreement between the three measures; however, we have found that there will be a small number of samples in every project on which no-one can agree. This is to be expected in a natural system where boundaries between petrofacies are gradational rather than abrupt. These are characterized as far as possible without bloodshed, since trained petrographers and ceramicists with temper identification skills are hard to find.

Once the final sherd characterization has established, the data are ready for archaeological interpretation by the ceramicist, using the stratified sherd sample to represent the overall data set.


Previous

Back to Start

Back to Overview

Ceramic Petrography Lab home


Index

Ceramic Petrography Lab home
Overview
Detailed Methods
Online Research Results

Detailed Methods Index

Introduction
Defining & Mapping Petrofacies
Collection of Sand Samples
Sand Sample Preparation
Point Count Methodology
Point Counting - How
Point Counting - What
Statistical Analysis
Correspondence Analysis
Petrofacies Refinement
Discriminant Analysis
Hand Sample ID Model
Describe Sand in Hand Sample
Flow Chart
Binocular Microscope Sherd Characterization
Sherd Thin Sections

Binocular stereomicroscope
Middle Rincon Red-on-brown pottery
Sherd photomicrograph

Home | About Us | Compliance Services | Analysis Services
Publications
| Selected Projects


© 2004 Desert Archaeology Inc.